Match statistics snapshot
- Sligo Rovers created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 0.71, Δ 0.41).
- Sligo Rovers fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Sligo Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 311Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 411Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.