Match statistics snapshot
- Sligo Rovers fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Waterford was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 21%).
- Sligo Rovers held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 66%Lead | Pass accuracy | 51% |
| 214Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 326Lead | Total passes | 249 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sligo Rovers | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.