Match statistics snapshot
- Slovan Bratislava created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 0.87, Δ 0.03).
- Slovan Bratislava fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Žilina was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Slovan Bratislava | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
0.90Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.87 |
1Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 2 |
8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
8Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
14Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 11 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Slovan Bratislava | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
394Lead | Accurate passes | 258 |
484Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Slovan Bratislava | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Slovan Bratislava | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
6Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 1 |
2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Slovan Bratislava | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Žilina leads this block
Žilina leads shot quality (+23% vs Slovan Bratislava)
Žilina leads (27% vs 0%).
Žilina leads shot quality (+23% vs Slovan Bratislava)
Slovan Bratislava leads (57% vs 55%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Žilina leads this block
Žilina leads possession efficiency (+39% vs Slovan Bratislava)
Žilina leads possession efficiency (+39% vs Slovan Bratislava)
Slovan Bratislava — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Slovan Bratislava leads this block
Slovan Bratislava leads territorial pressure (+33% vs Žilina)
Slovan Bratislava leads territorial pressure (+33% vs Žilina)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Žilina leads this block
Žilina — stronger shot quality allowed
Žilina — stronger shot quality allowed
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Slovan Bratislava leads this block
Slovan Bratislava had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Slovan Bratislava leads (22.0 vs 18.0).
Slovan Bratislava leads (47.8 vs 31.6).
Slovan Bratislava leads (10.0 vs 8.0).
Žilina leads (0.079 vs 0.064).
Žilina leads (93.6 vs 92.1).
Slovan Bratislava leads (26.0 vs 18.0).