Match statistics snapshot
- Smouha SC fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 19%).
- Smouha SC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Smouha Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Smouha Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 305Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 390Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Smouha Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Smouha Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Smouha Sc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.