Match statistics snapshot
- Sonderjyske created the clearer chances on xG (2.19 vs 1.54, Δ 0.65).
- Brondby fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Sonderjyske was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 2.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 396Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 491Lead | Total passes | 431 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Brondby |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.