Match statistics snapshot
- Sonderjyske created the clearer chances on xG (2.65 vs 1.70, Δ 0.95).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Sonderjyske was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 2.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 434 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |