Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.81 vs 2.38, Δ 0.57).
- Viborg fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Sonderjyske was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.38Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 537Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sonderjyske | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.