Match statistics snapshot
- Shrewsbury fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Shrewsbury was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
- South Shields held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| South Shields | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
1Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 5 |
2 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
7 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 21Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| South Shields | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
600Lead | Accurate passes | 174 |
690Lead | Total passes | 270 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| South Shields | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
0 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| South Shields | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
3 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 9Lead |
5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| South Shields | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Shrewsbury leads this block
Shrewsbury leads shot accuracy (+167% vs South Shields)
Shrewsbury leads shot accuracy (+167% vs South Shields)
Shrewsbury leads box penetration (+133% vs South Shields)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Shrewsbury leads this block
South Shields — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
South Shields — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Shrewsbury leads this block
Shrewsbury leads territorial pressure (+488% vs South Shields)
Shrewsbury leads territorial pressure (+488% vs South Shields)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Shrewsbury leads this block
Shrewsbury had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.
Shrewsbury leads (20.0 vs 18.0).
South Shields leads (61.8 vs 18.6).
Shrewsbury leads (16.0 vs 2.0).
Shrewsbury leads (27.0 vs 19.0).