Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.77, Δ 0.76).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Southampton | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.77Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Southampton | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 271Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 353Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Southampton | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Southampton | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Southampton | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.