Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (0.42 vs 0.64, Δ 0.22).
- QPR fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Southampton held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Southampton | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Southampton | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 727Lead | Accurate passes | 190 |
| 786Lead | Total passes | 263 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Southampton | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Southampton | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Southampton | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |