Match statistics snapshot
- Southampton created the clearer chances on xG (3.30 vs 0.14, Δ 3.16).
- Southampton fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- Southampton held more of the ball (80% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Southampton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.14 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Southampton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 80%Lead | Ball possession | 20% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 737Lead | Accurate passes | 141 |
| 800Lead | Total passes | 198 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Southampton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Southampton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Southampton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |