Match statistics snapshot
- Southampton created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.36, Δ 1.01).
- Southampton fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Southampton | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.36 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Southampton | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 532Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 596Lead | Total passes | 413 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Southampton | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Southampton | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Southampton | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |