Match statistics snapshot
- Spakenburg fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Katwijk was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Spakenburg held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 381 |
| 623Lead | Total passes | 535 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.