Match statistics snapshot
- Spakenburg fired more attempts (22 vs 21 shots).
- Katwijk was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 23%).
- Katwijk held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 21 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 339 | Accurate passes | 444Lead |
| 479 | Total passes | 573Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Spakenburg | Statistic | Katwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.