Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 1.24, Δ 0.19).
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- Sport Boys was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sport Boys | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sport Boys | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 209Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 302Lead | Total passes | 255 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sport Boys | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sport Boys | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sport Boys | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.