Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (2.01 vs 2.46, Δ 0.45).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sport Recife | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.46Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sport Recife | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 230 | Accurate passes | 268Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 360Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sport Recife | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sport Recife | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sport Recife | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |