Match statistics snapshot
- Sporting Cristal created the clearer chances on xG (1.86 vs 1.22, Δ 0.64).
- Sporting Cristal fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Sporting Cristal was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sporting Cristal | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sporting Cristal | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 507Lead | Accurate passes | 219 |
| 584Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sporting Cristal | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sporting Cristal | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.37 | Goals prevented | 0.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sporting Cristal | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |