Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.93, Δ 0.29).
- Sporting Kansas City fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sporting Kansas City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sporting Kansas City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 336 | Accurate passes | 580Lead |
| 447 | Total passes | 689Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sporting Kansas City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sporting Kansas City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sporting Kansas City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.