Match statistics snapshot
- SpVgg Unterhaching created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 1.56, Δ 0.07).
- Energie Cottbus fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- SpVgg Unterhaching was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.56 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 430Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 11Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.