Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 1.21, Δ 0.37).
- Verl fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- SpVgg Unterhaching was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 216 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 287 | Total passes | 527Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Spvgg Unterhaching | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |