Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Magdeburg fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- SSV Ulm 1846 was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ssv Ulm 1846 | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ssv Ulm 1846 | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 174 | Accurate passes | 379Lead |
| 252 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ssv Ulm 1846 | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ssv Ulm 1846 | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ssv Ulm 1846 | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.