Match statistics snapshot
- St.
- Louis City created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 0.40, Δ 0.95).
- St.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| St. Louis City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| St. Louis City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 432Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| St. Louis City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| St. Louis City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| St. Louis City | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.