Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 1.70, Δ 0.59).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 45%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stabaek | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stabaek | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 682Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 738Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stabaek | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stabaek | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stabaek | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.