Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (2.08 vs 2.94, Δ 0.86).
- Start fired more attempts (23 vs 17 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 22%).
Start vs Ham-kam
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Start | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.94Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 23Lead | Total shots | 17 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Start | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Start | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Start | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Start | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Other
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Start | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Free Kicks | 9 |