Match statistics snapshot
- Stellenbosch fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Stellenbosch was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
- Stellenbosch held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 442Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.