Match statistics snapshot
- Stellenbosch fired more attempts (12 vs 4 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Royal AM held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 356 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 428 | Total passes | 478Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stellenbosch | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.