Match statistics snapshot
- Stevenage created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.52, Δ 0.95).
- Stevenage fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Stevenage was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 130 | Accurate passes | 291Lead |
| 231 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.