Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 29%).
- Reading held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
| 7 | Total shots | 20Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 142 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 243 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |