Match statistics snapshot
- Stevenage created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 0.04, Δ 2.11).
- Stevenage fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Stevenage was more accurate in front of goal (18% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.04 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 155 | Accurate passes | 224Lead |
| 251 | Total passes | 330Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stevenage | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |