Match statistics snapshot
- Stockport County created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 1.13, Δ 0.91).
- Stockport County fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Luton was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stockport County | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 1.13 |
0Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 4 |
12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
5Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
13Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 8 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stockport County | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
279Lead | Accurate passes | 242 |
378Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stockport County | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stockport County | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 1 |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stockport County | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Stockport County leads this block
Luton leads shot accuracy (+225% vs Stockport County)
Luton leads shot accuracy (+225% vs Stockport County)
Stockport County leads (0.157 vs 0.141).
Stockport County leads box penetration (+23% vs Luton)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Stockport County leads this block
Stockport County leads possession efficiency (+60% vs Luton)
Stockport County leads possession efficiency (+60% vs Luton)
Luton — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Stockport County leads this block
Stockport County leads territorial pressure (+68% vs Luton)
Stockport County leads territorial pressure (+68% vs Luton)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Stockport County leads this block
Stockport County — stronger shot quality allowed
Stockport County — stronger shot quality allowed
Stockport County leads (0.56 vs 0.51).
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Stockport County leads this block
Stockport County had the edge in 6 of 6 signals in this block.
Stockport County leads (21.0 vs 17.0).
Stockport County leads (39.2 vs 33.4).
Stockport County leads (17.0 vs 9.0).
Stockport County leads (0.157 vs 0.141).
Stockport County leads (85.9 vs 84.3).
Stockport County leads (22.0 vs 14.0).