Match statistics snapshot
- Fulham created the clearer chances on xG (0.69 vs 1.47, Δ 0.78).
- Fulham fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
0.69 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 1.47Lead |
5 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
2 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
8 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 17Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
219 | Accurate passes | 508Lead |
280 | Total passes | 588Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
1 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
3Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham leads shot accuracy (+25% vs Stoke City)
Fulham leads shot accuracy (+25% vs Stoke City)
Fulham leads (0.086 vs 0.086).
Fulham leads box penetration (+206% vs Stoke City)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Fulham leads this block
Stoke City — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Fulham leads (0.022 vs 0.022).
Stoke City — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham leads territorial pressure (+327% vs Stoke City)
Fulham leads territorial pressure (+327% vs Stoke City)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham — stronger shot quality allowed
Fulham — stronger shot quality allowed
Fulham leads keeper workload (+41% vs Stoke City)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham had the edge in 6 of 6 signals in this block.
Fulham leads (14.0 vs 7.0).
Fulham leads (58.5 vs 25.0).
Fulham leads (24.0 vs 3.0).
Fulham leads (0.086 vs 0.086).
Fulham leads (91.4 vs 91.4).
Fulham leads (14.0 vs 9.0).