Match statistics snapshot
- Stoke City fired more attempts (6 vs 4 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 33%).
- Stoke City held more of the ball (80% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 2Lead |
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 80%Lead | Ball possession | 20% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 47% |
| 523Lead | Accurate passes | 75 |
| 627Lead | Total passes | 161 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stoke City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.