Strindheim 4-2 Herd Prediction

StrindheimStrindheim
4 — 2FT
HerdHerd
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsFormInjuriesH2H

Updated

StrindheimStrindheimvsHerdHerd

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — model leans Herd

Estimated win chances: Strindheim 33.7%, draw 23.6%, Herd 42.7%. From 3 and 3 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityMedium
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialHigh
Draw riskMedium
Model confidenceMedium

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.46Expected goals1.67

From 3 and 3 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–111.2%
  • 1–29.3%
  • 2–18.1%
  • 0–17.6%
  • 2–26.8%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

14Cold spellStrindheim
Weighted momentum

Herd arrives with stronger form weighting (+70 momentum).

84Hot streakHerd
Strindheim · High-risk / fragileHerd · hot form

Strindheim

0W · 1D · 2L
Recent →DLL
Momentum index

Herd

2W · 1D · 0L
Recent →WWD
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapHerd +6

Strindheim

1 pts
0% wins

0W · 1D · 2L · 3 played

For
4
Against
7
Goal diff -3

Herd

7 pts
67% wins

2W · 1D · 0L · 3 played

For
9
Against
4
Goal diff +5

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Strindheim offensive edge

    Strindheim faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.

    -33
  • Herd offensive edge

    Herd's attack (69%) vs Strindheim's defense (36%).

    +33

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Strindheim31
Herd69

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Strindheim36
Herd64

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Strindheim14
Herd84

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Strindheim-16
Herd116

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Strindheim48
Herd30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Strindheim13
Herd88

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Strindheim0
Herd0
StrindheimHigh-risk / fragile
Herdhot form