Match statistics snapshot
- Stromsgodset created the clearer chances on xG (2.01 vs 0.95, Δ 1.06).
- Stromsgodset fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Fredrikstad held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 385 | Accurate passes | 463Lead |
| 478 | Total passes | 572Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |