Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 2.46, Δ 1.50).
- Stromsgodset fired more attempts (19 vs 16 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.46Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 452Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 500Lead | Total passes | 375 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |