Match statistics snapshot
- Stromsgodset created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 0.37, Δ 0.29).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 380 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 464 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |