Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 1.21, Δ 0.27).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- KFUM Oslo held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 436Lead |
| 445 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |