Match statistics snapshot
- Stromsgodset created the clearer chances on xG (3.92 vs 2.41, Δ 1.51).
- Stromsgodset fired more attempts (25 vs 16 shots).
- Stromsgodset was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 3.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.41 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 23Lead | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 361 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 430 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Stromsgodset | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |