Match statistics snapshot
- Sporting CP created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 1.80, Δ 1.17).
- Sporting CP fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Sporting CP was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sturm Graz | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sturm Graz | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 243 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 336 | Total passes | 535Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sturm Graz | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sturm Graz | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sturm Graz | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.