Match statistics snapshot
- Catanzaro created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 2.33, Δ 1.52).
- Catanzaro fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Sudtirol was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.33Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 163 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 249 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.