Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
- Como held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 445Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.