Match statistics snapshot
- Feralpisalo fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Feralpisalo was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 15%).
- Feralpisalo held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 357 | Total passes | 508Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |