Match statistics snapshot
- Sudtirol created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 0.77, Δ 0.13).
- Mantova fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Mantova was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 425Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sudtirol | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.