Match statistics snapshot
- Sunderland created the clearer chances on xG (3.09 vs 1.37, Δ 1.72).
- Sunderland fired more attempts (22 vs 16 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.37 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.