Match statistics snapshot
- Sunderland created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.92, Δ 0.21).
- Sunderland fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 251 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.21 | Goals prevented | 0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |