Match statistics snapshot
- Sunderland created the clearer chances on xG (1.92 vs 1.26, Δ 0.66).
- Sunderland fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 593Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 686Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.