Match statistics snapshot
- Sunderland created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 0.69, Δ 0.65).
- Sunderland fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- Sunderland was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 562Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 648Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.