Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 0.83, Δ 0.18).
- Wolves fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Wolves held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.83Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 393Lead |
| 341 | Total passes | 466Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.78 | Goals prevented | -1.78 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sunderland | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |