SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 Match Statistics & xG

SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 in 2. Bundesliga.

Match statistics snapshot

Away created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 1.84, Δ 0.22).
Home fired more attempts (22 vs 7 shots).
Away was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 36%).

SV Darmstadt 98vsSC Paderborn 07

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
1.62	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	1.84Lead

	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.
14Lead	Shots inside the box	7

8Lead	Shots off target	2
8Lead	Shots on target	5

8Lead	Shots outside the box	0
22Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	7

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
49%	Ball possession	51%Lead
84%Lead	Pass accuracy	83%
330	Accurate passes	343Lead
394	Total passes	412Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
5Lead	Corner kicks	2

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
6Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	0
3	Goalkeeper saves	8Lead
1.54	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.	1.54

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
11Lead	Fouls	12
	Red cards
2	Yellow cards	2

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Away leads this block

0Home

duels won

3Away

Away leads shot accuracy (+96% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home36%34% share
Away71%66% share
Away leads shot accuracy (+96% vs Home)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.07422% share
Away0.26378% share
Away leads shot quality (+257% vs Home)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home64%39% share
Away100%61% share
Away leads box penetration (+57% vs Home)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.03348% share
Away0.03652% share
Away leads (0.036 vs 0.033).
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home1823% share
Away5977% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+124% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home4769% share
Away2131% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+124% vs Away)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.26378% share
Away0.07422% share
Away — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.6175% share
Away0.2025% share
Home leads keeper workload (+203% vs Away)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Away leads this block

2Home

duels won

4Away

Away had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home15.048% share
Away16.052% share
Away leads (16.0 vs 15.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home41.249% share
Away42.351% share
Away leads (42.3 vs 41.2).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home19.068% share
Away9.032% share
Home leads (19.0 vs 9.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.07422% share
Away0.26378% share
Away leads (0.263 vs 0.074).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home73.744% share
Away92.656% share
Away leads (92.6 vs 73.7).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home19.058% share
Away14.042% share
Home leads (19.0 vs 14.0).

SV Darmstadt 98vsSC Paderborn 07

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
1.62	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	1.84Lead

	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.
14Lead	Shots inside the box	7

8Lead	Shots off target	2
8Lead	Shots on target	5

8Lead	Shots outside the box	0
22Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	7

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
49%	Ball possession	51%Lead
84%Lead	Pass accuracy	83%
330	Accurate passes	343Lead
394	Total passes	412Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
5Lead	Corner kicks	2

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
6Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	0
3	Goalkeeper saves	8Lead
1.54	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.	1.54

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
11Lead	Fouls	12
	Red cards
2	Yellow cards	2

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Away leads this block

0Home

duels won

3Away

Away leads shot accuracy (+96% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home36%34% share
Away71%66% share
Away leads shot accuracy (+96% vs Home)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.07422% share
Away0.26378% share
Away leads shot quality (+257% vs Home)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home64%39% share
Away100%61% share
Away leads box penetration (+57% vs Home)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.03348% share
Away0.03652% share
Away leads (0.036 vs 0.033).
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home1823% share
Away5977% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+124% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home4769% share
Away2131% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+124% vs Away)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.26378% share
Away0.07422% share
Away — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.6175% share
Away0.2025% share
Home leads keeper workload (+203% vs Away)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Away leads this block

2Home

duels won

4Away

Away had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home15.048% share
Away16.052% share
Away leads (16.0 vs 15.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home41.249% share
Away42.351% share
Away leads (42.3 vs 41.2).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home19.068% share
Away9.032% share
Home leads (19.0 vs 9.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.07422% share
Away0.26378% share
Away leads (0.263 vs 0.074).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home73.744% share
Away92.656% share
Away leads (92.6 vs 73.7).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home19.058% share
Away14.042% share
Home leads (19.0 vs 14.0).

SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 Match Statistics & xG | Sportra

SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 Match Statistics & xG

SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

SV Darmstadt 98 vs SC Paderborn 07 match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor