Match statistics snapshot
- SV Elversberg created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 0.94, Δ 0.36).
- SV Elversberg fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 321 | Accurate passes | 344Lead |
| 397 | Total passes | 424Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.05 | Goals prevented | -0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sv Elversberg | Statistic | 1. Fc Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |